Allergies more likely in Bulgarian children exposed to pththalates in dust.
|
Kolarik B, K Naydenov, M Larsson, CG Bornehag and J Sundell. 2008. The association between phthalates in dust and allergic diseases among Bulgarian children. Environmental Health Perspectives 116:98–103. |
![]() |
| viralbus, Flickr. |
Young children living in houses with the highest measured levels of a common phthalate in house dust were two to four times as likely to report wheezing or allergic symptoms than those with lower levels. The results are similar to those found by Swedish investigators in 2004 and support the notion that exposure to common chemicals may contribute to recent increases in allergic disease in the industrialized world.
Context
Asthma is much more common today than it was in the 1970s, with almost 8 percent of Americans having the respiratory ailment. The disease affects children more severely than adults because it constricts their already small airways. With age, asthma becomes less common and generally less severe.
Almost twice as many boys as girls have asthma, but among adult asthmatics, women predominate. While usually controllable in the developed world, asthma occasionally kills its victims. In the US, fatalities occur mostly in females and blacks. Death rates have fallen the last several years due to better medical intervention, even though the disease frequency has not.
The hallmark of asthma is reversible airway obstruction and "hyperreactivity," in which the cells lining the throat, trachea and lungs overreact to some trigger. Allergens (dust mites, mold), physical stimuli (cold, exercise) and chemicals (tobacco smoke, strong odors) can act as triggers. During an attack, airways constrict, swell and inflame, which causes the classic symptoms of chest tightness, wheezing and shortness of breath.
Asthma is the subject of intense research, but the reason asthma has become more common is still not understood. The increase in asthma has happened too quickly to explain it by genetic changes to DNA. Environmental changes are a likely cause, but which of the many are to blame?
Indoor environments are one possibility, since most adults and children living in the industrialized world spend most of their lives inside. As homes and other buildings are built "tighter" to save energy, air exchange with the outside can drop and indoor contaminants can build.
Tobacco smoke, dust mite droppings and molds are among the most common indoor air contaminants. The many chemicals released from commercial products also lower indoor air quality.
Phthalates are a group of chemicals found in many everyday products. They are known to act like hormones, disrupting endocrine actions that may alter reproduction and development.
The larger-sized phthalate, like di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), turn hard polyvinyl chloride (PVC) plastic into soft and flexible "vinyl" products. These phthalates are not permanently bound to the products and gradually leach out.
Smaller phthalate molecules are widely used to carry colors and scents in cosmetics, perfumes and paints and to act as inert ingredients in pesticides. Virtually all of us are exposed daily to small amounts of these potential chemicals in food, water and air.
Phthalate exposure has been associated with asthma. In a 2004 study, Carl-Gustaf Bornehag and colleagues found that Swedish children living with the most DEHP in house dust were three times more likely to be diagnosed with asthma than kids in houses with the lowest levels of DEHP. Another phthalate, butyl benzyl phthalate, was present in higher quantities in the house dust of kids with rhinitis (nose inflammation) or eczema (a type of skin problem).
Curiously, these findings were uncovered during the Dampness in Building Health (DBH) study that was started in 2000 to determine which molds and other problems of damp buildings were the culprits in asthma and allergy. When mold failed to pan out as expected, they examined common chemical exposure and found associations with phthalates.
These surprising results needed to be duplicated. The researchers redid the study in Bulgaria to verify the original study and provide a stronger connection between phthalates and asthma.
What did they do?
In mid-2004, questionnaires on housing and health were sent to all the parents of young children (ages 2, 3, 5 and 7 years old) in selected districts of two Bulgarian cities. The parents of 4,479 children returned the survey (a response rate of 35 percent).
Of those, 730 potential cases and 1,275 potential controls were identified. Cases were the children who were reported to have at least 2 of these 3 symptoms: wheezing during the last 12 months, rhinitis during the last 12 months when not having a cold or itching rash eczema in the last 12 months. Potential controls reported none of these three symptoms or several other allergy and asthma questions.
Follow up questionnaires, late refusals by parents and technical errors gave final numbers of 102 cases and 82 controls.
Inspectors visited the homes of the 184 children and collected dust samples from above floor level (e.g., over the door) in each child's room, as was done in the DBH study. Six phthalates were measured in these dust samples, and expressed as a fraction of the total weight of the collected dust.
Researchers then calculated the likelihood that children were cases, rather than controls, as a function of the percent phthalate in the house dust samples. Adjustments were made for the child's age and gender, smoking in the home (current; or during pregnancy/first year of life) and the presence of allergy or asthma symptoms in any other family member.
What did they find?
Of the six phthalates measured, DEHP level in the dust was associated with both case status and wheezing in the last 12 months. Specifically, children in homes with the highest levels of DEHP, when compared with children having the lowest levels, were 2.9 times more likely to be a case rather than a control, and 3.7 times more likely to report wheezing in the last 12 months.
No other phthalates were significantly associated with wheezing, rhinitis, eczema or case status in this study.
In Bulgaria, the common word for linoleum and PVC-based flooring is the same – "balatum". Since neither the survey nor the inspectors could reliably distinguish between these two types of balatum, it was not possible to specifically examine the relationship between PVC-flooring in a child's room and presence of symptoms. However, the presence of any type of balatum (as reported by inspectors) increased the odds of case status by 2.2 times, wheezing during the last 12 months by 2.6 times and rhinitis by 2.2 times. No association was found between phthalates in the dust and balatum flooring.
The use of polishing products when dusting was significantly associated with increased (1.9 times greater) odds of wheezing in the last 12 months and with the levels of butyl benyl phthalate (BBzP) and di-n-octyl phthalate (DnOP) in the indoor dust. More frequent cleaning was associated with fewer health problems and with lower levels of BBzP in the dust.
Only 35 percent of households responded to the original questionnaire. Low response rates can skew results if the non-responders are different from those who respond. To assess whether biased non-response happened in this study, the researchers surveyed by phone 240 randomly selected households that failed to return the original questionnaire.
Excluding the eczema and family members with allergy/asthma questions, no statistically significant differences between the two groups were found. The prevalence of wheezing, rhinitis and eczema was greater in the subjects that agreed to home inspections as compared with those who only answered the survey. Since exposures were determined by laboratory testing rather than survey questions, this higher prevalence is unlikely to have biased the study's results.
What does it mean?
In this study, DEHP levels in the dust of children's rooms were associated with increased risk of asthma and allergy symptoms.
These results are similar to those found in the earlier Swedish study and add to the likelihood that the results represent real DEHP health effects rather than chance or confounded findings. Although the Swedish study found an association between BBzP in dust and rhinitis and eczema, this study did not, which reduces the likelihood that the earlier BBzP findings represent true effects.
If DEHP is indeed aggravating asthma, as suggested by this study, it could be acting as an adjuvant and increasing allergic responses to allergens already in the environment. A 2006 study from Japan found that DEHP can act as an adjuvant, as it increased the effects of dust mite allergen in mice. However, research results on this question are inconsistent and the question is far from settled.
Neither the Bulgarian study nor the earlier Swedish study incorporate time into the design such that the diseases are measured months or years after the exposures. This lack of time sequencing makes "reverse causation" a risk – the possibility that the disease may be causing the (innocent) exposure, instead of the exposure causing the disease.
If this study were done in the United States, it would be particularly vulnerable to this problem, since people with allergies might exchange wall-to-wall carpeting (common in the U.S.) for less-dusty PVC-based flooring, thus creating a false linkage between PVC and allergy. But wall-to-wall carpeting is rare in Sweden, and so the argument makes little sense there. Whether it makes sense in Bulgaria is not described by the authors.
In summary, this study shows an association between the level of DEHP (the common phthalate plasticizer) in dust and asthma/allergy symptoms in Bulgarian children. This result is similar to that found by an earlier study conducted in Sweden and strengthens the possibility that DEHP exposure is actually causing or aggravating disease.
Cohort studies - a type of case-control study that incorporates time between exposure and onset of disease - with similar findings would strengthen these results. The authors are now conducting a birth cohort study that will further test these findings and determine the importance of early life exposures to endocrine disrupting chemicals on the development of asthma, allergies and other disease.
ResourcesAmerican Lung Association. Trends in asthma morbidity and mortality. August 2007. Bornehag C-G, J Sundell, CJ Weschler, T Sigsgaard, B Lundgren, M Hasselgren and L Hägerhed-Engman 2004. The association between asthma and allergic symptoms in children and phthalates in house dust: a nested case-control study. Environmental Health Perspectives. 112(14):1393-7. National Center for Health Statistics. Asthma prevalence, health care use and mortality: United States, 2003-05. Rees, John. 2005. ABC of asthma/prevalence. British Medical Journal 331:443-445. Takano, H, R Yanagisawa, K Inoue, T Ichinose, K Sadakane and T Yoshikawa. 2006. Di-(2-ehylhexyl) phthalate enhances atopic dermatitis-like skin lesions in mice. Environmental Health Perspectives 114(8):1266-1269. US Environmental Protection Agency. An introduction to indoor air quality. Wikipedia. Immunologic adjuvant. |
Phthalates


