A common fungicide kills frog tadpoles, may contribute to amphibian declines.
|
McMahon, T, N Halstead, S Johnson, TR Raffel, JM Romansic, PW Crumrine, RK Boughton, LB Martin and JR Rohr. 2011. The fungicide chlorothalonil is nonlinearly associated with corticosterone levels, immunity and mortality in amphibians. Environmental Health Perspectives http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1002956. |
![]() |
| jpmckenna/flickr |
| Among the species tested, the southern leopard treefrog was one of the most sensitive to clorothalonil exposure. |
Researchers at the University of South Florida report that a widely used fungicide may contribute to declines in amphibian populations and affect fitness of surviving frogs. Frog tadpoles exposed under varying conditions to levels lower and higher than those predicted to be in the environment died within days, but the rates depended on the species. Prior studies in minnows, trout, clams and water fleas report similar results. Chemicals have long been proposed to play a role in decreasing numbers of amphibians. This study is important because it is one of a handful of examples where high mortality was seen in frogs exposed to levels of fungicide that are realistically present in the environment.
Context
Chlorothalonil is a broad-spectrum pesticide mainly used to kill mold, mildew and other fungi on golf courses, lawns and crops – predominantly, peanuts, potatoes, corn and fruit. It is also used to eliminate bacteria and other microbes, insects, and algae.
Chlorothalonil is one of the most widely used synthetic fungicides in the United States. Every year, nearly nine million pounds are applied to crops and turf. The fungicide is most commonly used in the northeast, southeast, the Great Lakes region and California (USGS 2002). It is commercially available under a host of brand names, including Bravo, Daconil, and Mold-Ex.
People are directly exposed to chlorothalonil when they apply the chemical, eat crops that have been sprayed with it, or drink water contaminated by runoff from irrigation or rain. The fungicide has been detected in surface water, rain and air samples (Sakai 2002, Scott et al. 2002). Chlorothalonil is in the same chemical family as the pesticide DDT, which has been banned for decades yet continues to persist in the environment.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) classifies chlorothalonil as a probable carcinogen in humans. In laboratory studies, animals exposed to high levels of the chemical develop skin lesions and stomach and kidney tumors (EPA 1999).
Among a group of 150 pregnant mothers from New Jersey, a recent study reported that 97 percent of moms had detectable levels of chlorothanolonil in their blood (Barr et al. 2010). The fungicide was not associated with adverse birth outcomes like low body weight and small head size.
Previous studies report that the fungicide kills a range of aquatic species at environmentally realistic levels, including minnows, trout, clams and water fleas (Sakai et al. 2002, Scott et al. 2002, Ernst et al. 1991, Sherrard et al. 2003). Chlorothalonil is one of the most heavily concentrated agrochemicals found in bee hives (Mullin et al. 2010). Because of this, some speculate that it is one of several chemicals that may contribute to colony collapse disorder.
Agrochemicals have also long been proposed to play a role in global reductions in amphibian populations. Frogs are viewed by many as sentinels of dangerous environmental conditions for other living creatures. Once released in the environment, chlorothalonil can move vast distances and contaminate mountain regions, which are epicenters of declining frog populations.
In addition to habitat loss, frogs are increasingly hard hit by infectious disease. Currently, a fatal skin fungus is severely diminishing global amphibian populations. Chlorothalonil suppresses immune function in oysters and trout (Baier-Anderson et al. 2000, Gagnaire et al. 2006, Shelley et al. 2009). In field workers, exposure is associated with contact dermatitis and immune cell damage (Lebailly et al. 1998, Penagos et al. 2002).
What did they do?
Researchers at the University of South Florida for the first time assessed the effects of chlorothalonil on tadpoles from four frog species, including Cuban, green and squirrel treefrogs and southern leopard frogs. They evaluated survival, levels of the stress hormone corticosterone, and immune system markers.
To mimic environmental exposures, the researchers created a natural frog habitat – a mesocosm – with water, leaf litter, phytoplankton, zooplankton crayfish and insects. Ten southern leopard frog tadpoles and 25 Cuban treefrog tadpoles were placed into the mesocosm.
The researchers used a computer program created by the EPA to estimate levels of chlorothalonil expected to occur in water after fungicide application. They estimated the environmentally relevant level at 164 micrograms per liter (μg/L).
The tadpoles were exposed to either the predicted amount, twice as much – 328 (μg/L) – or none. The researchers compared the number of deaths and the rate of development with and without the fungicide to determine effects on the tadpoles.
The researchers also exposed two species – five squirrel treefrog tadpoles and 15 Cuban treefrog tadpoles – to different concentrations of chlorothalonil. Concentrations ranged from 10 times the predicted environmental level of the fungicide to 1,000 times less.
Frog mortality was also measured in jars containing three tadpoles each of Cuban treefrog, southern leopard frog or green treefrog. These species were individually exposed to eight different levels of chlorothalonil ranging from the environmentally predicted level to 10,000 times less.
At the end of the experiment, surviving Cuban treefrog tadpoles were tested for liver and immune system toxicity.
Finally, researchers exposed Cuban treefrog tadpoles to different amounts of the fungicide for 4, 28 or 100 hours. After the exposure period ended, they measured levels of corticosterone in the surviving tadpoles. Corticosterone is a steroid hormone that is elevated in response to natural or chemical stressors like fungicides.
What did they find?
When the researchers created a natural environment to house the animals, they found that only tadpoles exposed to the fungicide died. They also noted that the fungicide caused death quickly: most animals died within the first 72 hours of the experiment.
When squirrel and Cuban treefrog tadpoles were housed together in jars, researchers found that the chemical killed Cuban treefrog tadpoles at levels far below what was predicted to be present in the environment.
Interestingly, high or low concentrations of the fungicide – but not intermediate levels – killed the tadpoles.
In the same experiment, they were unable to assess mortality in squirrel treefrog tadpoles because most of the unexposed tadpoles died in the experiment. The researchers suggest that the Cuban treefrogs out-competed the squirrel treefrogs for available food and so, they died.
In a critical experiment, researchers found that 100 percent of Cuban treefrog, southern leopard frog and green treefrog tadpools died after 10 hours of exposure to the environmentally estimated level of the fungicide.
In the same experiment, tadpoles were exposed to lower levels of chlorothalonil – up to 10,000 times less than the environmentally estimated level or 0.0164 µg/L. Sensitivity to the fungicide varied. For example, southern leopard treefrogs were the most sensitive species – 86 percent of the tadpoles died when exposed to 1,000 times less fungicide than the environmentally predicted level. The least sensitive species tested was the Cuban treefrog.
Researchers found that high or low concentrations of chlorothalonil – but not intermediate levels – also killed the southern leopard and green treefrog tadpoles.
Cuban treefrog tadpoles that survived fungicide exposure had smaller livers, fewer liver immune cells and higher corticosterone levels. This experiment raises concerns about the health and fitness of tadpoles that survive chlorothalonil exposure.
What does it mean?
Second to habitat loss, chemicals in the environment pose the largest threat to declining amphibian populations. This study is important because it is one of a handful of examples where high mortality was seen in frogs exposed to environmentally realistic levels of fungicide.
Additionally, this study reports that exposure to chlorothalonil kills frog tadpoles at levels far below those currently found in the environment. And, researchers found that tadpoles that survived exposure to the fungicide may have weakened or stressed immune systems. This raises critical concerns about the general health and fitness of surviving frogs and their ability to fight off infections.
Together, these findings suggest that chlorothalonil exposure can impact amphibian populations in two different ways. One, the fungicide can directly kill tadpoles. Two, it can indirectly kill frogs by weakening their immune systems and rendering them more susceptible to infectious disease.
The study also reported that low or high levels, but not intermediate levels, of the fungicide increase tadpole death and stress hormone levels. This is at odds with the conventional belief that higher concentrations of a chemical always cause greater harm. Instead, the study supports the growing concept that a wide variety of agrochemicals have adverse effects at very low, environmentally relevent levels.
In the current study, environmentally relevant levels of chlorothalonil were estimated using a computer tool created by the EPA. Future work is needed to more accurately understand real-world exposure levels of chlorothalonil.
ResourcesBarr, DB, CV Ananthb, X Yanc, S Lashleyd, JC Smuliane, TA Ledouxf, P Horec and MG Robson. 2010. Pesticide concentrations in maternal and umbilical cord sera and their relation to birth outcomes in a population of pregnant women and newborns in New Jersey. Science of the Total Environment 408(4):790-5. Baier-Anderson, C and R Anderson. 2001. The effects of chlorothalonil on oyster hemocyte activation: phagocytosis, reduced pyridine nucleotides, and reactive oxygen species production. Environmental Research 81(1):72-78. Ernst, W, K Doe, P Jonah, J Young, G Julien and P Hennigar. 1991. The toxicity of chlorothalonil to aquatic fauna and the impact of its operational use on a pond ecosystem. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 21(1):1-9. Gagnaire, BA, H Thomas-Guyon, T Burgeot and T Renault. 2006. Pollutant effects on Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg), hemocytes: screening of 23 molecules using flow cytometry. Cell and Biological Toxicology 22 (1):1-14. Lebailly, PC, C Vigreux, C Lechevrel, D Ledemeney, T Godard, F Sichel, JY LeTalaer, M Henry-Amar and P Gauduchon. 1998. DNA damage in mononuclear leukocytes of farmers measured using the alkaline comet assay: modifications of DNA damage levels after a one-day field spraying period with selected pesticides. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention 7(10):929-940. Mullin, CA, M Frazier, JL Frazier, S Ashcraft, R Simonds, D van Engelsdorp and JS Pettis. 2010. High levels of miticides and agrochemicals in North American apiaries: implications for honey bee health. PLoS One 5(3):e9754. Penagos, HG. 2002. Contact dermatitis caused by pesticides among banana plantation workers in Panama. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health 8(1):14-18. Sakai, M. 2002. Determination of pesticides and chronic test with Daphnia magna for rainwater samples. Journal of Environmental Science and Health B 37(3):247-54. Scott, GI, MH Fulton, EF Wirth, GT Chandler, PB Key, JW Daugomah, D Bearden, KW Chung, ED Strozier, M DeLorenzo, S Sivertsen, A Dias, M Sanders, JM Macauley, LR Goodman, MW LaCroix, GW Thayer and J Kucklick. 2002. Toxicological studies in tropical ecosystems: an ecotoxicological risk assessment of pesticide runoff in South Florida estuarine ecosystems. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 50(15):4400-8. Shelley, LK, SK Balfry, PS Ross and CJ Kennedy. 2009. Immunotoxicological effects of a sub-chronic exposure to selected current-use pesticides in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).Aquatic Toxicology 92(2):95-103. Sherrard, RM, CL Murray-Guldea, JH Rodgers, Jr. and YT Shah. 2003. Comparative toxicity of chlorothalonil: Ceriodaphnia dubia and Pimephales promelas. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 56(3):327-33. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.1999. Office of Prevention, Pesticides, and Toxic Substances. Reregistration eligibility decision (RED) for chlorothalonil. U.S. Geological Survey. 2002. Chlorothalonil pesticide use map. |

The above work by Environmental Health News is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
Based on a work at www.environmentalhealthnews.org.
Amphibian declines


