Media Reviews
EHS scientists and fellows critique media coverage.
Reporter deprives listeners of reliable BPA science coverage.
NPR science correspondent oversteps study's conclusions in a blog about BPA science.
Factual article explains Dow Chemical's dioxin legacy.
A Chicago Tribune reporter writes an excellent article about dioxin contamination along the Saginaw River in Michigan.
Reporter thoroughly covers pesticide controversy.
A Fresno Bee reporter clearly and accurately relates the science, health risks and controversy of using methyl iodide.
Left out and forgotten? Refinery's health risks.
The ArgusLeader missed a chance to explain the risks of air pollutants in an article about the air quality permit being issued for a new oil refinery in South Dakota.
Herbicide may not cure weeds in Lake Lily.
A recent article ignores the past lessons learned from using herbicides as a quick cure to manage aquatic weeds.
BPA-free story neglects children's health concerns.
Children's unique vulnerability to bisphenol A is left out of an otherwise excellent news story that reports the chemical was measured in bottles marketed as BPA-free.
Twisting concerns over BPA.
The reporter and a quoted industry representative ignore a major point of a recent BPA study.
Glyphosate: public health vs profit in Argentina.
Argentina's herbicide controversy pits health against the economy, but a Financial Times article fails to capture the issue's global importance.
Underscoring health hazards of herbicides.
Missing is the science explaining the environmental health problems associated with lawn pesticide use.
Radio interview covers tough topic.
Reporter tackles a difficult subject—birth defects and time of conception—but omits some study details.
