Current query:

Article Text contains Michaels [delete]

Solutions: Organizing principles > Scientific Integrity [delete]

Subject contains Science [delete]

Current issues: GMO/bioengineering [delete]

Refine:

by Text Search

by Type

by Human health condition

by Contamination agent

by Exposure pathway

by Ecological effects

by Infrastructure

by Emerging science

by Coverage

by Publisher

by Reporter

by Date
1 to 10 of 10 items 
 
While all links worked when entries were posted to the database, different publishers have different policies about retaining articles and providing access to archived material. Thus some of the links, particularly older ones, may no longer be functional. For links no longer working, you may be able to gain paid access to text via the publisher's site.
Whose side are health advocacy groups on? Some of the most influential and vocal health experts belong to advocacy organizations such as the Center for Science in the Public Interest and the American Council on Science and Health. Who are they, and what do they stand for? Los Angeles Times, California. 4 July 2009. [Registration Required]
Science's worst enemy: corporate funding. The biggest threat to science has been quietly occurring under the radar. The threat is money—specifically, the decline of government support for science and the growing dominance of private spending over American research. Discover. 18 October 2007. [related story]
Journals feel pressure to adopt disclosure rules. As environmental journals publish more controversial papers on topics such as human health and global warming, they face a serious issue that medical journals have long been dealing with--conflict of interest. Environmental Science & Technology. 21 September 2006. [related stories]
'Sound science' isn't just a catch phrase - it's a real persuader. The Bush administration, senators, industrialists and farmers repeatedly invoke the term "sound science" to delay or deep-six policies they oppose and dismiss criticism of those they favor. Knight Ridder. 4 May 2006.
Scientist rebels against WHO over bird flu. A lone Italian researcher has cast a harsh spotlight on the WHO's treatment of bird flu data, suggesting that it places academic pride over public health. Wall Street Journal. 14 March 2006. [Subscription Required]
Bringing fresh air to this part of the sausage factory. Michael Fumento, the self-described "extremely pro-biotech" journalist who lost his syndicated column after Business Week revealed he'd solicited money from Monsanto, is mad at me. Los Angeles Times, California. Opinion, 3 February 2006. [Registration Required]
Smoked out. Investigative reporting reveals that Steve Milloy, a columnist for FoxNews and publisher of junkscience.com, has been paid directly by tobacco and oil companies while writing about those issues in his columns, with no mention of payments. New Republic. 27 January 2006. [related stories]
Writers’ ethics. Several prominent opinion writers have recently lost their syndicated contracts because they had previously undisclosed financial arrangements with companies. Living On Earth. 22 January 2006.
Doctors reportedly sold drug-study secrets. The chairman of a Senate committee overseeing the financial markets is urging regulators to investigate the findings of a Seattle Times report that medical researchers routinely accept money to reveal secrets about drug studies to Wall Street firms. Seattle Times, Washington. 9 August 2005.
NIH chief defends new rules on ethics. National Institutes of Health Director Elias A. Zerhouni, meeting with scientists who have railed against sweeping new ethics regulations, defended the rules aimed at halting conflict-of-interest problems. But scientists at yesterday's two-hour meeting said they found the agency director sympathetic to their grievances. Baltimore Sun, Maryland. 25 February 2005. [related stories]
1 to 10 of 10 items